News:

Buffalo provides Data Recovery services. Read about it here.

Main Menu

Why only one NIC on terstation II iSCSI? Where's the Terastation III iSCSI?

Started by devnull1369, July 02, 2009, 02:39:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

devnull1369

July 02, 2009, 02:39:59 PM
   

So that pretty much sums up my questions.  It seems pointless to have iSCSI with only one NIC.  I know you can't eliminate all sinlge points of failures but an extra NIC seems like a small design change to allow for an immensely important part of redundancy. 

 

Any comments from Buffalo?  When are we going to see the Terastation III (which has dual NICs) in a iSCSI form so I can be comfortable buying it?

Colin137

#1
July 02, 2009, 03:14:00 PM

I'm not sure at the moment, but I'll check with our corporate office.

Colin137

#2
July 02, 2009, 06:25:15 PM
I've just heard from corporate that we're working on a TS III iSCSI unit, but we have no timetable as of yet.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions
Browser ID: smf (is_webkit)
Templates: 4: index (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 6: init, html_above, body_above, main, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 5: index+Modifications.english (default), Post.english (default), Editor.english (default), Drafts.english (default), StopForumSpam.english (default).
Style sheets: 4: index.css, attachments.css, jquery.sceditor.css, responsive.css.
Hooks called: 146 (show)
Files included: 35 - 1354KB. (show)
Memory used: 996KB.
Tokens: post-login.
Queries used: 15.

[Show Queries]