News:

RAID is not a replacement for a backup! Here's why.

Main Menu

No real interest in supporting their products

Started by xrapidx, January 18, 2016, 11:40:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

xrapidx

I wish I'd done more research on Buffalo and their products, I've seen quite a few posts now relating to support, or lack their of.  >:(

Bought a Buffalo TS-4800 with the intention of creating a RAID6 array which I could expand overtime - I also made sure to buy drives which were on their compatibility list to limit any issues I might have, and to make sure everything would work.

After creating the RAID array, and populating it - I realized I was about 2TB short on space, so I went out and sourced another disk - only to discover a RAID6 array is not expandable as advertised. Fortunately I discovered this while I still had all my smaller disks to make backups (again).

I logged a support issue on the 4th of December  - I was given the run around which had me continually rebuilding/recreating the array until I was eventually told that they reproduced the problem on their side and it was in-fact a bug. Whether or not they'll fix it, they can't tell me. I was told I'd get feedback in the new year. Nothing.

Contacted support again today (18th of January), again told no feedback. So I still don't know if this is even going to be fixed.

Really great when you buy a product from a company who offer very little backup, virtually no support on their own product.

You'd think considering this is a fairly significant bug on their NAS device, they'd give it some sort of priority.

I most certainly won't be buying another Buffalo product, or recommending them - its unfortunate I attempted to resolve this in December instead of returning the product before its return period lapsed.





xrapidx

Don't hold your breath - as you can see, its over a year and the problem wasn't fixed, and they never contacted me again via the logged ticket.

Certainly won't buy one of their products again.

Eastmarch

Are you at the latest firmware version? I seem to remember this one being a display issue on older firmwares. My 5800 allows for adding drives via RMM.
**A single copy of data, even on a RAID array, is NOT a backup! Hard drive failure is not a question of IF, but WHEN! Don't take my word for it, take Google's!**

xrapidx

I recreated the array numerous times.  Updated firmware, etc. It's fine for RAID5, but not RAID6.

I've subsequently populated all the bays a day created a RAID6 array... it is due to be replaced  extra year, and you can guess which manufacturer I won't be considering.

mpiechota

Agreed.  I've had an email ticket open for a time now.  Drive tells me it has an error.  I've sent a log in 3x - they keep telling me that the log I send is not from the unit with the error.  Uhh.. yeah it is. 

Oh, and I'm now getting email replies to *other* person's tech tickets.  Twice now.

Browser ID: smf (is_webkit)
Templates: 4: index (default), Display (default), GenericControls (default), GenericControls (default).
Sub templates: 6: init, html_above, body_above, main, body_below, html_below.
Language files: 5: index+Modifications.english (default), Post.english (default), Editor.english (default), Drafts.english (default), StopForumSpam.english (default).
Style sheets: 4: index.css, attachments.css, jquery.sceditor.css, responsive.css.
Hooks called: 197 (show)
Files included: 35 - 1354KB. (show)
Memory used: 1046KB.
Tokens: post-login.
Queries used: 15.

[Show Queries]