Author Topic: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ  (Read 8704 times)

mitasol

  • Calf
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #15 on: December 12, 2008, 09:20:22 PM »
   

I have not set any passwords. I just went back in to reset the time and this time it worked!

 

How do I "sign in" to the Linkstation?


Paul

  • Big Bull
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2008, 09:24:33 AM »
Unless you have the original version of the Linkstation EZ (buffalos first release of this model, then you can not do it) put the IP address of the linkstation into any web browser (firefox, IE, Safari, ect...)
Message Edited by Paul on 12-13-2008 09:26 AM

mitasol

  • Calf
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #17 on: December 13, 2008, 04:23:50 PM »
   And it's all in Japanese

Paul

  • Big Bull
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2008, 09:10:57 AM »
I would flash the firmware again then set the unit back to factory defaults then power cycle it.

mitasol

  • Calf
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2008, 03:13:38 AM »
   

I have updated the firmware and reset default and power cycled, still in Japanese, even my mothers unit is in Japanese.

 

I'd like a little more information on the patch that Microsoft is working on to enable Vista backup to work please. I am beta testing Vista SP2 and backup still requests authentication.


Paul

  • Big Bull
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #20 on: December 16, 2008, 10:40:28 AM »
One of our QA guys found a problem using Windows Vista's built in backup 
utility with Samba as the backup destination.  I've got a solution that
I am posting for sanity checking and to submit if it is correct and
useful.  Here's the issue:

My setup:
Windows Vista and Samba 3.0.23d (running on FC1, RH9 and SUSE 10 systems
all have the same symptom, but FC6 did not show this problem)

To reproduce problem:
Use Vista backup and specify a Samba share as the destination.  Backup
attempts to create a directory (eg.
{653AA951-BE0F-436B-B5D5-FEF6AD150E6E}) on the target share and you will
get an error message telling you that it already exists.

Analysis:
What is happening is that Samba successfully creates the directory but
fails when trying to set the ACL specified in the create request,
returning an NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED error.  Backup retries the request
with the create flags set to 'fail if exists', which explains the
somewhat misleading error message.

What is happening is that backup is trying to set an ACL on this
directory and some of the ACEs map to the same user.  On my setup the
owner gets represented at least twice, once by it's own SID and again by
the SID S-1-3-0 (well known SID 'Creator Owner').  This will lead to
illegal multiple entries for of type SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ or SMB_ACL_USER
causing the ACL to be rejected by the kernel when the call is made to
set it.

EXAMPLE from log.smbd:
[2007/01/30 16:43:06, 10] smbd/posix_acls.c:set_canon_ace_list(3456)
  canon_ace index 0. Type = allow SID = S-1-1-0 other SMB_ACL_OTHER
perms ------
  canon_ace index 1. Type = allow SID = S-1-5-32-549 gid 100
(AllLocalUsers) SMB_ACL_GROUP_OBJ perms ------
  canon_ace index 2. Type = allow SID = S-1-3-0 uid 1 (admin)
SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ perms rwxdpo
  canon_ace index 3. Type = allow SID =
S-1-5-21-3748822599-1304825643-849436012-1002 uid 1 (admin)
SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ perms rwxdpo


The solution that I found was to modify slightly the function merge_aces
which originally merged ACEs based on a SID match.  I expanded the
matching to also match the unix id as follows:

Original code:
    if (sid_equal(&curr_ace->trustee, &curr_ace_outer->trustee) &&
                (curr_ace->attr == curr_ace_outer->attr)) {

Modified code:
    if ( (sid_equal(&curr_ace->trustee, &curr_ace_outer->trustee) ||
(curr_ace->unix_ug.uid == curr_ace_outer->unix_ug.uid)) &&
                (curr_ace->attr == curr_ace_outer->attr)) {


Note the additional test that checks if the unix id is a match.

Results:
With this change in place I am able to backup successfully.  I hope this
fix is correct, but if not maybe the information above will give someone
else a head start in solving this correctly.  I reproduced this failure
on three different linux distros but not on FC6 (I suspect that FC6 may
be more forgiving when it comes to setting the ACL) so if you are not
able to reproduce this problem it may be because the system you are
running Samba on is also willing to overlook this.

prion

  • Calf
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #21 on: April 19, 2009, 11:26:26 AM »
   

How can I use the linkstation ez 320gb or 500gb as I only have linux (mint) laptop?

 


Dustrega

  • Big Bull
  • *****
  • Posts: 1394
Re: LS-LGL Linkstation EZ
« Reply #22 on: April 24, 2009, 07:51:43 PM »
I would consult the DHCP pool of your router for starters. Other than that there's really not much else I could offer as NAS Navi doesn't work in Linux :(