Tony, you missed the point. That is why we do not use the term "wireless bridging". It is truely called "WDS". We advertise it as a bridge because it can be used as a bridge. It just can't bridge wirelessly.
For example, I have my house wired with ethernet cable. I have AT&T uverse so I have to use their modem, which is also a wireless router. Their wireless router doesn't have great wireless signal so I bridged my WHR-HP-G54 upstairs (put it into bridge mode and connected through the LAN ports). Now I get wireless internet upstair where I didn't get wireless previously.
In this senario, I need my router to have the "bridge" function, but I do not need to have a "WDS" function. See the difference? I suggest you find a router that supports "WDS" or "Wireless Bridging", not just "bridging".
I hope this clears things up a little bit. We can send up a feature request (or advertising request) but no matter how many people argue, the definitions do not change.
Message Edited by PCPiranha on 09-07-2009 02:24 PM